Animal Farm And The Truman Show Analysis - 1341 Words

In the novel ‘animal farm’ and the film ‘the Truman show’ George Orwell and Peter weir talk about how power, utopian societies, and the good life are relevant to the narratives. In these film/novel. In Animal Farm/ Truman show power can be used in many ways good or bad, but if you have too much of it you can use the power you have in many bad ways. The good life is demonstrated as the place where everyone works together and can achieve their goals in life. These novel/films have made it clear that Old Major’s, idea of utopia is a place where everyone is equal. However, in the Truman Show, Peter Weir uses Christof as a bad way of using the power which is quite similar to Napoleon. The good life for Truman isn’t actually the good life for†¦show more content†¦(3.2). In conclusion, these books are quite similar with control and power Christof, Mr jones and napoleon use their power in bad ways. In animal farm, George Orwell explores the idea is The good life possible to achieve. the good life is a reference saying that your life cant get any better. The novel represents the good life in many ways but throughout the novel, napoleon deviates from what was a civil idea being the seven commandments. All all the animals thought that just because Napoleon is an animal that they will treat much better.â€Å"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?† In Truman show, peter weir explores the idea is a good life is possible to achieve. The good life is a reference saying that your life cant get any better. In the film, Truman show Christof makes Truman Burbanks life, the good life in this book/movie. Christof has mad Trumans life â€Å"the good life† but once Truman finds out that his life was a tv show he new his whole life was a lie.†Weve become bored with watching actors give us phony emotions. We are tired of pyrotechnics and special effects. While the world he inhabits is, in some respects, counterfeit, theres nothing fake about Truman himself. No scripts, no cue cards. It isntShow MoreRelatedEmergency Management Essay18946 Words   |  76 Pagesidentifying unacceptable risks, assessing vulnerabilities, and devising strategies for reducing unacceptable risks to more acceptable levels. Of course, emergency managers cannot perform all of these activities by themselves. However, as later chapters will show, they can act as â€Å"policy entrepreneurs† that propose strategies and mobilize community support for risk reduction. In general terms, emergency management is â€Å"the discipline and profession of applying science, technology, planning and managementRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesand peace so consciously pursued through the establishment of international organizations and diplomatic exchanges. Despite these endeavors, the levels of domestic and international violence within human populations and the ravages visited upon animals and the natural world by humans vastly exceeded that of any previous era in history. In a century where human communities globally and individuals locally had the potential to be much more intensely connected by new communications technologiesRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesUniversity James Gelatt, University of Maryland University College Joe Gerard, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee Matthew Giblin, Southern Illinois University Donald Gibson, Fairfield University Cindi Gilliland, The University of Arizona Mary Giovannini, Truman State University David Glew, University of North Carolina at Wilmington Leonard Glick, Northeastern University Reginald Goodfellow, California State University Jeffrey Goldstein, Adelphi University Jodi Goodman, University of Connecticut Claude GraeffRead MoreManagement Course: Mba−10 General Management215330 Words   |  862 Pagesmanufacturing purposes before final production Corporate emphasis on an organization’s intellectual strength All these factors are just some of the management innovations that have been basic drivers of productivity and profitability growth. Figure 1 shows data from our company’s experience with the strong results of such business management innovation throughout a wide range of areas—from product development, supply chain, customer relations, and total quality to human resources, alliances, and partneringRead More1000 Word Essay85965 Words   |  344 Pagescounseling is slightly different than future counselings in that it primarily focuses on what areas? Communicating performance standards to the rated NCO. It should specifically let the rated NCO know what is expected during the rating period. The rater shows the rated NCO the rating chain and a complete duty description, discusses the meaning of the values and responsibilities contained on the NCOER, and explains the standards for success. (DA PAM 623-3 May 2006 / 3-1 / PDF 36) Who is the last individual

From Leninism to Stalinism A Logical Progression Free Essays

The question of whether or not Stalinism was a logical continuation of Leninism is a difficult one. Stalinism did take significantly more drastic measures than Leninism did. There were differences in policy. We will write a custom essay sample on From Leninism to Stalinism: A Logical Progression or any similar topic only for you Order Now But in spite of these, Stalinism still found its basis in Leninism. Even Trotsky, a friend of Lenin and a staunch opponent of Stalin, grudgingly admits that â€Å"Stalinism did issue from Bolshevism† (Trotsky). Stalin’s policy of socialism in one country, his use of terror to eliminate opposition, and his suppression of democracy and the soviets were all characteristics of Lenin well before they were characteristic of Stalin. Although some of Stalin’s policies were different from those of Lenin, what difference Stalinism did show from Leninism were either policies which Lenin had called for but never put into action, or logical continuations of Lenin’s original principles, but modified to suit the demands of the time. One of Stalin’s main focuses was on the concept of â€Å"socialism in one country† – that is, the focus on the betterment exclusively of his own country rather than on the international communist revolution. â€Å"Socialism in one country† began with Lenin. In 1918 Lenin signed the Treaty of Brest-Livtosk, which pulled Russia out of WW1 and surrendered much of the Ukraine to Austria-Hungarian forces (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). At this time, there was a revolutionary movement in the Ukraine composed of peasants and workers known as the Makhnovist movement. This group needed only the support of Lenin and Russia to launch their own socialist revolution. However, they were not given this support (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Clearly, Lenin’s focus was on the well-being of Russia rather than the International Communist Movement. He was focused on Socialism in One Country. Lenin’s actions, compromising his political ideals for the sake of peace, would later be echoed by Stalin when Stalin signed a non-aggression pact with Adolf Hitler on August 23, 1939. In addition to a focus on socialism only within his own country, Stalin also focused on a concentration of governmental control of industry and agriculture. This policy, originated by Lenin under the moniker of state capitalism, was a clearly established goal of Leninism well before Stalin implemented it. Lenin said that â€Å"Socialism isnothing but state capitalist monopoly made to benefit the whole people† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). It is clear that his idea of socialism was one of governmental economic control. Moreover, Lenin fully intended for this plan to be implemented. He said that â€Å"If we introduced state capitalism in approximately 6 months’ time we would achieve a great success† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). As the government gained more and more control over the economy, Lenin felt it necessary to defend his actions. He published an article in April of 1918 in which he stated that â€Å"Unquestioning submission to a single will is absolutely necessary for the success of the labor process†¦ the revolution demands, in the interests of socialism, that the masses unquestioningly obey the single will of the leaders of the labor process† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). In addition to demonstrating the Leninist ideal of state capitalism, it also shows that Lenin viewed absolute governmental authority as necessary, a policy that would be further instituted during the totalitarian rule of Stalin. One aspect of Lenin’s state capitalism was the forced collectivization of agriculture. In article six of his â€Å"April Theses,† Lenin called for â€Å"Nationalization of all lands in the country, and management of such lands by local Soviets of Agricultural Laborers’ and Peasants’ Deputies† (Russian History 1905-30†³). In 1929, when Stalin forced collectivization onto the agricultural workers, he was simply putting Lenin’s concepts into action. Lenin had had the original idea, and had felt it was a necessary action, but he had been unable to put his plan fully into effect. Stalin was able to take a previously incompletely implemented Leninist policy and put it into action. In their attempts to bring the workers under governmental control, Leninists were willing to take drastic action. In May of 1918, a new decree stated that only one third of industrial management personnel could be elected, the rest being appointed to their positions. In April of 1920, Trotsky stated that â€Å"Deserters from labor ought to be formed into punitive battalions or put into concentration camps† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Arguments have been raised which state that Lenin’s New Economic Policy is a demonstration of the fact that Leninism’s goal was not one of total governmental control. However, the New Economic Policy was only instituted by Lenin when it became absolutely necessary for the survival of Russia, and even then it was only intended to be a temporary measure before returning to state capitalism. Despite the temporary nature of the New Economic Policy, it was still viewed by many leading members of the Communist party as being too drastic a departure from Leninist doctrine. When Stalin abandoned the New Economic Policy, he was not abandoning a part of Leninism. Rather, he was banning a policy that even Lenin himself had not intended to be permanent, and that many people viewed as being a policy contrary to the aims of Leninism (Wood, p. 23-26). Stalin was also characterized by his strong suppression of opposition, which is once again a Leninist trait. A decree of the Sovnarkom on December 20, 1917 called for the creation of a commission â€Å"to persecute and break up all acts of counter-revolution and sabotage all over Russia, no matter what their origin† (â€Å"Russian History 1905-30†). The decree further read that â€Å"measures [to be taken against these counter-revolutionaries are] confiscation, confinement, deprivation of [food] cards, publication of the names of the enemies of the people, etc† (â€Å"Russian History 1905-30†). While these actions were admittedly not as drastic as Stalin’s, they do represent a strong, forceful suppression of opposition. In addition, Stalin was in power after these measures had already proven futile. Given the ineffectiveness of these methods, a logical continuation of these policies would have been to increase the severity of the suppression. In addition, other actions taken by Leninism were far more drastic. In a Cheka raid in Moscow in April 1918, 26 Anarchist centers were raided, killing or injuring 40 Anarchists and imprisoning over 500 more (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Another feature common to both Stalin and Lenin was their attempts to eliminate any democratic or representative forms of government. This too was a continuation of a long-standing Leninist policy well before Stalin was in power. Starting in 1918, in elections for factory committees, an approved list of candidates was created beforehand, and voting was done by a show of hands while a member of the Communist cell read the names and armed Communist guards watched on. Voicing opposition to the proposed candidates would result in wage cuts (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Lenin’s suppressions were not limited to non-communists. As Stalin would later do, Lenin also worked to eliminate any possible sources of dissention within the Communist party. In 1918 there was a faction within the party that was critical of the new policy of Taylorism, a system used to measure the outputs of the workers in the country. This faction was centered around the journal Kommunist. At a Leningrad party conference, the majority supported Lenin’s demand â€Å"that the adherents of Kommunist cease their separate organizational existence† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Three years later, the 1921 party congress issued a ban on all factions within the Communist party. Speaking regarding one of these factions, the Workers Opposition, Trotsky said they had â€Å"placed the workers right to elect representatives above the party. As if the party were not entitled to assert its dictatorship even if that dictatorship temporarily clashed with the passing moods of the workers democracy† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). We can see the dark motivations behind Leninism’s banning of factions: to keep the democracy from interfering with the dictatorship. Well before Stalin was using his power to eliminate any who might oppose him, Lenin was carefully and thoroughly removing the opponents to his power. In the trade union congress of April 1920, Lenin stated that in 1918 he had â€Å"pointed out the necessity of recognizing the dictatorial authority of single individuals for the purpose of carrying out the soviet idea† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). This concept of a single absolute ruler that Lenin felt was so necessary was to become one of the points for which Stalin was later criticized. In setting himself up as an absolute dictator, Stalin was merely following what Lenin had said was necessary. Another aspect of Stalin’s suppression of opposition was his violent suppression of workers revolts and the soviets. Stalinism crushed revolts in East Berlin in 1953, in Hungary in 1956, and in Czechoslovakia in 1968, as well as many other, smaller revolts (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). This policy would seem to contradict the Leninist ideal, in which the government was built for the workers, and a revolt of the workers would have been something that occurred only as a step towards a communist society. However, we can find this policy originating from Leninism. The Leninist government itself often showed strong opposition to attempts made by the workers to increase their power. The first All-Russian Congress of Soviets, held in June of 1917, stated that giving full power to the soviets would have â€Å"greatly weakened and threatened the revolution† (â€Å"Russian History 1905-30†). In 1921, at the Kronstadt naval base, workers attempted to elect a soviet. They also issued a declaration which called for the reestablishment of the democratic soviets, and an end to censorship of speech and press. These actions were supported by the workers, the sailors, and many members of the Bolshevik party. However, official Leninist forces stormed the base, killing many of the rebels who were unable to escape. Leninism had demonstrated that it was opposed to a representative government designed with the wants of the workers in mind. All of the defining policies of Stalinism were either policies that had originally being instituted by Leninism, policies called for by Leninism but not put into action until Stalinism, or else Leninist policies modified to fit the needs of the situation. Stalinism was a logical continuation of Leninism. How to cite From Leninism to Stalinism: A Logical Progression, Essay examples

Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd

Question: Discuss about the Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd. Answer: Introduction: The causes of action which the respondents have alleged to the financial institution were as follows that: The negotiation was not an honest one; The assurance was acquired by undue influence; The assurance was provoked by means of falsification or concealment of facts which would have been revealed by financial institutions as it was the responsibility of the financial institution to do so (Australasian Legal Information Institute, 2016). The three conclusions which were made by the appellate court in overturning the verdicts of the trial Judge were as follows: The advance should be set aside; The financial institution was under a duty to unveil the true point of the corporations accounts and so it was made legally responsible for Vincenzos frauds; The deal made was an dishonest one for which equity would grant support (Law Teacher, 2016). Justice Gibbs, held that it no, the financial institutions were not always necessary to advise an recommending guarantor about the state of the account of the consumer which was to be guaranteed. While the obligation of a financial institution to advise data to a consumer in these kinds of cases arises only; where there was a specific agreement among financial institution and the consumer of a type which the guarantor would not anticipate, was the matter here. The financial institutions have been abortive to inform those specific agreements, which misused a material piece of the deal with the consequence that the assurance was not mandatory. The particular situations in this matter included: The agreement with the financial institution and Vincenzo to enlarge the overdraft and to necessitate Vincenzo to considerably bind that overdraft within a short span The financial institutions careful dishonoring of cheques was an attempt to uphold the Corporations pretense of wealth (Australian Contract Law, 2013). It has been clearly stated that in order to entail a bank to make revelation to a surety of all remarkable dealings which to the information of the bank had taken place among the consumer and the third party; it must show that the dealing was both vexatious and deceptive as well as a violation of self-assurance has taken place. In this case the two facts which convinced Justice Gibbs to necessitate financial institution to make disclosure were as follows: Falsification was done for malfunction which occurred on the part of financial institution to make announcement of the existing situations; The sign was taken in a wrong way by confusing the clauses as they did not know about the earlier overdrafts and so they were only bound for $50,000 for which they signed the paper so it was not mandatory on the respondents (Jade, 2016). So, it was accomplished by Justice Gibbs that the financial institution has failed in making revelation about the situation which existed among the financial institution and the corporation earlier. So, it amounted to falsification whereas the memorandum of mortgage included such a guarantee which was not in the acquaintance of the respondents so they did not owed a duty for it (Aitken Whyte Lawyers, 2016). As per Justice Mason it has been accomplished that the respondents were permitted to get assistance on the view that the financial institution was responsible of the dishonest behavior in obtaining the implementation of the loan assurance by the respondents. It has also discussed the distinction and overlap among various equitable claims. The rule of law given by Justice Mason was dissimilar from the rule given by Justice Gibbs as Justice Gibbs concluded that it was not a case of unconscionable behavior and this case is related to misrepresentation whereas the ratio given by Justice Mason declared that the bank was guilty of a unconscionable behavior and that the respondents were permitted to an order setting aside the mortgage assurance. The situations are as follows: The circumstance of particular shortcoming in which the respondents were located was the result of their dependence on and their assurance in their son who, sort to serve his own wellbeing, advised them to grant the loan assurance which the financial institution essential as a circumstance of growing the accepted overdraft edge of his corporation. Financial institutions had frequently and endlessly have violated other cheques, the payment of which was not necessary to the preservation of the supply of construction materials. Where Mr. Virgo had knowledge of the facts then it would have been unimaginable that the option did not occur to Mr. Virgo that the respondents entrance into the dealing was appropriate to their incapability to make judgments. According to Justice Mason the unconscionable behavior in a constricted sense tolerate some similarity to the principle of exertion but there has been a distinction among the two. In exertion the will of the respondents was not self-governing and intentional as it was overborne. In dishonest behavior the will of the respondents even if autonomous and controlled was the consequence of the detrimental place in which the person was located (Thomson Reuters, 2016). As per Justice Deane both a dishonest dealing and the rules connecting to the undue influence were closely interrelated. The two ruling were, though, different. Undue influence, looks to the eminence of the permission or consent of the weaker party whereas dishonest dealing looks to the behavior of the stronger party in effort to implement, or preserve benefits (Chitty, 2012). It was concluded that the respondents were under a appropriate disability in dealing with the financial institution. And they were not fully misleaded as to the conditions and consequence of the assurance as they believed that the paper which they were signing was a assurance sustained by a loan (Thampapilla, et.al. 2015). In situations where the guarantor was induced to give a assurance to financial institution as a result of some falsification by its consumer then the soundness of the assurance was not unnatural so far as the financial institution was worried unless it had a observance of the indecency or ought to have been put upon the investigation that might occur. It may also be stated that an agreement of surety ship was not a agreement made in utmost good confidence but it may be set aside on the opinion of falsification. Though, it was a established ruling that mere non revelation of a fact does not cancel such a agreement. References: Aitken Whyte Lawyers. (2016). Unconscionable Conduct Under the Australian Consumer Law and Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio. Retrieved on 21st September 2016 from: https://www.awbrisbanelawyers.com.au/unconscionable-conduct-under-the-australian-consumer-law-cba-amadio-lawyers-brisbane.html Australasian Legal Information Institute. (2016). Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 (12 May 1983)HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA. Retrieved on 21st September 2016 from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgibin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/1983/14.html?stem=0synonyms=0query=title%20(%20%22amadio%22%20) Australian Contract Law. (2013). Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio(1983) 151 CLR 447; [1983] HCA 14. Retrieved on 21st September 2016 from: https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/cases/amadio.html Chitty, J. (2012). Chitty on Contracts: General principles. Sweet Maxwell. Jade.(2016).Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd. v. AMADIO (1983) 151 CLR 447 12 May 1983. Retrieved on 21st September 2016 from: https://jade.io/article/67047 Law Teacher. (2016). Commercial Bank Of Australia V Amadio. Retrieved on 21st September 2016 from: https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/contract-law/commercial-bank-of-australia-v-amadio-contract-law-essay.php Thampapillai, D., Tan, V., Bozzi,C., and Matthew, A. (2015). Australian Commercial Law. Cambridge University Press. Thomson Reuters. (2016). Miles and Dowler, A Guide to Business Law 21st edition Study Aid Chapter summaries Chapter 13. Retrieved on 21st September 2016 from: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/product/AU/files/720506676/chapter_summary_21e___ch_13.pdf